Finding Fault with Defaults

Despite the fact that it is very much a buyer’s market, I decided to sell my house a few weeks ago.  I priced it

istockphoto.com

 aggressively and was under contract within three weeks.  This is great news and I’m fortunate to have made a sale so quickly in this market, but the truth is I’d prefer to rent my house rather than sell it.  The rental options in my area are limited, so I could have easily rented the house for more than my monthly mortgage payment, including taxes and insurance.  So why did I decide to sell my house if it would actually be quite profitable to rent it?

I made this decision after a conversation I had with a property manager who handles many rental houses in the area.  She told me that it is extremely difficult to find reliable tenants right now.  Many people are in the rental pool because they’ve lost their homes to foreclosure.  Unfortunately, many of these now-renters see no problem with not paying their rent consistently.  Not paying rent is a small leap from not paying the mortgage.  I’m sure that this isn’t true of everyone who has been forced into the rental market by a foreclosure.  But it’s true of enough people that the property manager I spoke with is having serious problems collecting rent for many of the properties she handles.  At this point in my life, I can’t afford the risk of having bad tenants who don’t pay their rent.  That’s why I made the decision to sell my house.

I’m very comfortable with this decision and I don’t regret it, but it has made me think a lot about our culture and the role that individual responsibility has in our society.  It’s very frustrating that so many people think it is okay to simply ignore their financial obligations.  It really shouldn’t be a surprise that people see nothing wrong with defaulting on their debts.  I have read a disturbingly high number of financial advice columns in which an “expert” tells people they should just walk away from their mortgages if it’s difficult to pay each month.  Even worse, I read one column recently that suggested it is okay to walk away from your mortgage if you owe more on the property than it is worth, regardless of your ability to pay

The New York Times recently published an online article that addresses this subject (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/03/business/03walk.html?hp).  The article quotes a mortgage broker in Arizona who shamelessly admits that he has advised people to walk away from their mortgages:

“Since the beginning of December, I’ve advised 60 people to walk away,” said Steve Walsh, a mortgage broker in Scottsdale, Ariz. “Everyone has lost hope. They don’t qualify for modifications, and being on the hamster wheel of paying for a property that is not worth it gets so old.”

Mr. Walsh is taking his own advice, recently defaulting on a rental property he owns. “The sun will come up tomorrow,” he said.

It is frightening that so many people see nothing wrong or immoral about not paying what they owe.  When someone lends you money and you refuse to give it back, that is not some sort of clever financial tactic.  It is stealing.  It is taking what doesn’t belong to you.  I don’t care if the money came from a big bank that received a tax payer bailout and is now making billions in profits.  That has nothing to do with your individual responsibility.  When you make a promise to pay back a loan by signing your name, you are accountable. 

Speaking of stealing and accountability, just think about what Mr. Walsh is doing to the tenants of his rental property.  His decision to default on the property means that his renters will have a very rude awakening when a bank suddenly tells them they have to move.  Hopefully Mr. Walsh does not currently have tenants in his property and his decision will not hurt anyone other than his lender (and his own credit history).  

I know there are situations where people get into terrible financial positions through little or no fault of their own.  I can be especially sympathetic to those who find themselves in foreclosure or bankruptcy due to medical costs.  When taking on debt is literally a matter of life and death, it’s hard to scold someone for doing what they had to do to survive.  There are a lot of people in this country who have been unable to get health insurance, and their finances have been thoroughly destroyed by their healthcare costs. 

I can even be somewhat sympathetic to those people who were manipulated and misled when they signed up for their mortgages.  There were a lot of unethical salespeople and companies marketing financially dangerous mortgages to vulnerable people.  But at the end of the day, those people are still responsible for their own financial decisions.  Their mortgages may be burdensome, but they committed to paying them.  I feel bad that they have had to learn a painful financial lesson, but that doesn’t mean they should be off the hook for what they owe. 

The abdication of personal responsibility is very harmful to our culture, especially when it comes to money and finance.  Free markets require a certain level of trust that people will do what they say and keep their promises.  Capitalism is not about screwing anyone you can to make a profit and get what you want.  I know it can be hard to believe that when you hear something like the testimony of the Goldman Sachs executives earlier this week.  Those executives are Grade A bastards.  But if we want to hold them to a higher standard, we need to hold ourselves to a higher standard as well.

Here’s the bottom line:  Defaulting on a mortgage because you feel like it or because you bought a lot of expensive stuff you couldn’t afford is morally wrong.  Excusing this behavior because the money is owed to a big evil bank is a very slippery slope.  I’m not a big evil bank, but apparently there are plenty of people out there who would steal from me by living in my house without paying me rent.  It is time for our society to feel some righteous indignation about such behavior.  Let’s continue to express our justifiable anger toward the banks and financial services companies who have caused so much pain in this country.  But let’s also direct some of that anger toward the individuals who take the same screw-you approach.  Their behavior is just as morally reprehensible.

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Money Philosophy

3 responses to “Finding Fault with Defaults

  1. Sandi

    “Excusing this behavior because the money is owed to a big evil bank is a very slippery slope.” Excellent point and definitely a new thought from what we’ve been hearing the past year or more.

  2. caroll

    Money and value… but also money and values. So true! A debt is a promise. Yes, it is a legal obligation, but it is first a moral obligation. What a great synopsis of the current situation.

  3. Kristen

    Love this article and I feel the same way ALL THE TIME when I hear recommendations to walk away from financial responsibilities!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s